added tdd tests for automatic refactoring

1 files changed, 27 insertions, 31 deletions

diff --git a/test/testFuncs3.c b/test/testFuncs3.c
index baf3f37..24b7ac6 100644
--- a/test/testFuncs3.c
+++ b/test/testFuncs3.c
@@ -15,10 +15,8 @@ int intarray4[3][2] = MACRO2;
 int answer = ANSWER;
 float floatbitaccess;
 
-
 /*********************************************************************************************************************/
-void tddfunc1 (void)
-{
+void tddfunc1(void) {
 	double complex z1 = 10.0 + 10.0 * I;
 	double complex z2 = 1.0 - 4.0 * I;
 
@@ -43,19 +41,17 @@ void tddfunc1 (void)
 	n1 = n2;
 }
 
-void tddfunc2(void)
-{
+void tddfunc2(void) {
 	static int staticint1;
 
 	unsigned short int port = 0x5aU;
 	unsigned short int result_8;
-	//uint16_t result_16;
-	//uint16_t mode;
+	// uint16_t result_16;
+	// uint16_t mode;
 	result_8 = (~port) >> 4;
 }
 
-void tddfunc3(void)
-{
+void tddfunc3(void) {
 	int a = 1;
 
 	READ_TIME_32();
@@ -63,14 +59,12 @@ void tddfunc3(void)
 	READ_TIME_34();
 }
 
-int* tddfunc4(void)
-{
+int *tddfunc4(void) {
 	int localauto;
 	return (&localauto);
 }
 
-void tddfunc5(void)
-{
+void tddfunc5(void) {
 	int arrint[4];
 	arrint[0] = 052;
 	arrint[1] = 067;
@@ -79,27 +73,29 @@ void tddfunc5(void)
 }
 
 /*12.12 tdd*/
-void tddfunc6(void)
-{
+void tddfunc6(void) {
 	float floatbitaccess;
-	int* pointertofloat;
+	int *pointertofloat;
 	int apartoffloat;
-	/*@DEVI-you cannot get away with this since c90 and c99 both specify that operands to & need to both be of integral types.*/
-	/*embedded compilers might not necessarily be ISO-C-complete so apparently this might be actually viable in some cases but
-	if the clang parser won't let this through, i can't analyze it so we can't check for this.*/
+	/*@DEVI-you cannot get away with this since c90 and c99 both specify that
+	 * operands to & need to both be of integral types.*/
+	/*embedded compilers might not necessarily be ISO-C-complete so apparently this
+	might be actually viable in some cases but
+	if the clang parser won't let this through, i can't analyze it so we can't check
+	for this.*/
 #if 0
 	apartoffloat = floatbitaccess & 0x000000FF;
 #endif
-	/*this results in a bticast castexpr which we are already tagging,clang does too, so im not overly concerned with this one
+	/*this results in a bticast castexpr which we are already tagging,clang does
+	too, so im not overly concerned with this one
 	though its fairly east to implement.*/
 	pointertofloat = &floatbitaccess;
 
-	/*we could literally just tag all unions having float members as possible violations.*/
-	union aunion
-	{
+	/*we could literally just tag all unions having float members as possible
+	 * violations.*/
+	union aunion {
 		float member1;
-		union member2
-		{
+		union member2 {
 			unsigned char member3;
 			unsigned char member4;
 			unsigned char member5;
@@ -111,13 +107,9 @@ void tddfunc6(void)
 	apartoffloat = aunionproto.member22.member5 & 0x000000FF;
 }
 
-int externfunc(int arg)
-{
-	return arg;
-}
+int externfunc(int arg) { return arg; }
 
-void testfunc7(void)
-{
+void testfunc7(void) {
 	unsigned char chararroct[7U];
 
 	chararroct[0U] = '\100';
@@ -127,5 +119,9 @@ void testfunc7(void)
 	chararroct[4U] = 125;
 	chararroct[5U] = '\x12';
 }
+
+void tddfunc8(void) {
+	// asm("add %al, (%rax)");
+}
 /*********************************************************************************************************************/
 /*last line intnetionally left blank.*/