diff options
author | Akinori Ito <aito@eie.yz.yamagata-u.ac.jp> | 2001-11-08 05:14:08 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Akinori Ito <aito@eie.yz.yamagata-u.ac.jp> | 2001-11-08 05:14:08 +0000 |
commit | 68a07bf03b7624c9924065cce9ffa45497225834 (patch) | |
tree | c2adb06a909a8594445e4a3f8587c4bad46e3ecd /gc/README.solaris2 | |
download | w3m-68a07bf03b7624c9924065cce9ffa45497225834.tar.gz w3m-68a07bf03b7624c9924065cce9ffa45497225834.zip |
Initial revision
Diffstat (limited to 'gc/README.solaris2')
-rw-r--r-- | gc/README.solaris2 | 65 |
1 files changed, 65 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gc/README.solaris2 b/gc/README.solaris2 new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e593513 --- /dev/null +++ b/gc/README.solaris2 @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ +The collector supports both incremental collection and threads under +Solaris 2. The incremental collector normally retrieves page dirty information +through the appropriate /proc calls. But it can also be configured +(by defining MPROTECT_VDB instead of PROC_VDB in gcconfig.h) to use mprotect +and signals. This may result in shorter pause times, but it is no longer +safe to issue arbitrary system calls that write to the heap. + +Under other UNIX versions, +the collector normally obtains memory through sbrk. There is some reason +to expect that this is not safe if the client program also calls the system +malloc, or especially realloc. The sbrk man page strongly suggests this is +not safe: "Many library routines use malloc() internally, so use brk() +and sbrk() only when you know that malloc() definitely will not be used by +any library routine." This doesn't make a lot of sense to me, since there +seems to be no documentation as to which routines can transitively call malloc. +Nonetheless, under Solaris2, the collector now (since 4.12) allocates +memory using mmap by default. (It defines USE_MMAP in gcconfig.h.) +You may want to reverse this decisions if you use -DREDIRECT_MALLOC=... + + +SOLARIS THREADS: + +The collector must be compiled with -DSOLARIS_THREADS to be thread safe. +It is also essential that gc.h be included in files that call thr_create, +thr_join, thr_suspend, thr_continue, or dlopen. Gc.h macro defines +these to also do GC bookkeeping, etc. Gc.h must be included with +SOLARIS_THREADS defined, otherwise these replacements are not visible. +A collector built in this way way only be used by programs that are +linked with the threads library. + +If you are using the Pthreads interface, also define _SOLARIS_PTHREADS. + +In this mode, the collector contains various workarounds for older Solaris +bugs. Mostly, these should not be noticeable unless you look at system +call traces. However, it cannot protect a guard page at the end of +a thread stack. If you know that you will only be running Solaris2.5 +or later, it should be possible to fix this by compiling the collector +with -DSOLARIS23_MPROTECT_BUG_FIXED. + +Jeremy Fitzhardinge points out that there is a problem with the dlopen +replacement, in that startup code in the library is run while the allocation +lock is held. This appears to be difficult to fix, since the collector does +look at data structures maintained by dlopen, and hence some locking is needed +around the dlopen call. Defining USE_PROC_FOR_LIBRARIES will get address +space layout information from /proc avoiding the dlopen lock. But this has +other disadvanatages, e.g. mmapped files may be scanned. + +If solaris_threads are used on an X86 processor with malloc redirected to +GC_malloc, it is necessary to call GC_thr_init explicitly before forking the +first thread. (This avoids a deadlock arising from calling GC_thr_init +with the allocation lock held.) + +It appears that there is a problem in using gc_cpp.h in conjunction with +Solaris threads and Sun's C++ runtime. Apparently the overloaded new operator +is invoked by some iostream initialization code before threads are correctly +initialized. As a result, call to thr_self() in garbage collector +initialization segfaults. Currently the only known workaround is to not +invoke the garbage collector from a user defined global operator new, or to +have it invoke the garbage-collector's allocators only after main has started. +(Note that the latter requires a moderately expensive test in operator +delete.) + +Hans-J. Boehm +(The above contains my personal opinions, which are probably not shared +by anyone else.) |