diff options
author | Akinori Ito <aito@eie.yz.yamagata-u.ac.jp> | 2001-11-15 00:32:13 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Akinori Ito <aito@eie.yz.yamagata-u.ac.jp> | 2001-11-15 00:32:13 +0000 |
commit | 85da7ee692072c643939e9f4b24fbd1e74e64e70 (patch) | |
tree | 9fc63298cf968fa560a9e3cf9b6c84516032fca8 /gc/doc/README.linux | |
parent | Updates from 0.2.1 into 0.2.1-inu-1.5 (diff) | |
download | w3m-85da7ee692072c643939e9f4b24fbd1e74e64e70.tar.gz w3m-85da7ee692072c643939e9f4b24fbd1e74e64e70.zip |
Update to w3m-0.2.1-inu-1.6.
Diffstat (limited to 'gc/doc/README.linux')
-rw-r--r-- | gc/doc/README.linux | 135 |
1 files changed, 135 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gc/doc/README.linux b/gc/doc/README.linux new file mode 100644 index 0000000..efd0a26 --- /dev/null +++ b/gc/doc/README.linux @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ +See README.alpha for Linux on DEC AXP info. + +This file applies mostly to Linux/Intel IA32. Ports to Linux on an M68K +and PowerPC are also integrated. They should behave similarly, except that +the PowerPC port lacks incremental GC support, and it is unknown to what +extent the Linux threads code is functional. See below for M68K specific +notes. + +Incremental GC is supported on Intel IA32 and M68K. + +Dynamic libraries are supported on an ELF system. A static executable +should be linked with the gcc option "-Wl,-defsym,_DYNAMIC=0". + +The collector appears to work with Linux threads. We have seen +intermittent hangs in sem_wait. So far we have been unable to reproduce +these unless the process was being debugged or traced. Thus it's +possible that the only real issue is that the debugger loses +signals on rare occasions. + +The garbage collector uses SIGPWR and SIGXCPU if it is used with +Linux threads. These should not be touched by the client program. + +To use threads, you need to abide by the following requirements: + +1) You need to use LinuxThreads (which are included in libc6). + + The collector relies on some implementation details of the LinuxThreads + package. It is unlikely that this code will work on other + pthread implementations (in particular it will *not* work with + MIT pthreads). + +2) You must compile the collector with -DGC_LINUX_THREADS and -D_REENTRANT + specified in the Makefile. + +3a) Every file that makes thread calls should define GC_LINUX_THREADS and + _REENTRANT and then include gc.h. Gc.h redefines some of the + pthread primitives as macros which also provide the collector with + information it requires. + +3b) A new alternative to (3a) is to build the collector and compile GC clients + with -DGC_USE_LD_WRAP, and to link the final program with + + (for ld) --wrap read --wrap dlopen --wrap pthread_create \ + --wrap pthread_join --wrap pthread_detach \ + --wrap pthread_sigmask --wrap sleep + + (for gcc) -Wl,--wrap -Wl,read -Wl,--wrap -Wl,dlopen -Wl,--wrap \ + -Wl,pthread_create -Wl,--wrap -Wl,pthread_join -Wl,--wrap \ + -Wl,pthread_detach -Wl,--wrap -Wl,pthread_sigmask \ + -Wl,--wrap -Wl,sleep + + In any case, _REENTRANT should be defined during compilation. + +4) Dlopen() disables collection during its execution. (It can't run + concurrently with the collector, since the collector looks at its + data structures. It can't acquire the allocator lock, since arbitrary + user startup code may run as part of dlopen().) Under unusual + conditions, this may cause unexpected heap growth. + +5) The combination of GC_LINUX_THREADS, REDIRECT_MALLOC, and incremental + collection fails in seemingly random places. This hasn't been tracked + down yet, but is perhaps not completely astonishing. The thread package + uses malloc, and thus can presumably get SIGSEGVs while inside the + package. There is no real guarantee that signals are handled properly + at that point. + +6) Thread local storage may not be viewed as part of the root set by the + collector. This probably depends on the linuxthreads version. For the + time being, any collectable memory referenced by thread local storage should + also be referenced from elsewhere, or be allocated as uncollectable. + (This is really a bug that should be fixed somehow.) + + +M68K LINUX: +(From Richard Zidlicky) +The bad news is that it can crash every linux-m68k kernel on a 68040, +so an additional test is needed somewhere on startup. I have meanwhile +patches to correct the problem in 68040 buserror handler but it is not +yet in any standard kernel. + +Here is a simple test program to detect whether the kernel has the +problem. It could be run as a separate check in configure or tested +upon startup. If it fails (return !0) than mprotect can't be used +on that system. + +/* + * test for bug that may crash 68040 based Linux + */ + +#include <sys/mman.h> +#include <signal.h> +#include <unistd.h> +#include <stdio.h> +#include <stdlib.h> + + +char *membase; +int pagesize=4096; +int pageshift=12; +int x_taken=0; + +int sighandler(int sig) +{ + mprotect(membase,pagesize,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE); + x_taken=1; +} + +main() +{ + long l; + + signal(SIGSEGV,sighandler); + l=(long)mmap(NULL,pagesize,PROT_READ,MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANON,-1,0); + if (l==-1) + { + perror("mmap/malloc"); + abort(); + } + membase=(char*)l; + *(long*)(membase+sizeof(long))=123456789; + if (*(long*)(membase+sizeof(long)) != 123456789 ) + { + fprintf(stderr,"writeback failed !\n"); + exit(1); + } + if (!x_taken) + { + fprintf(stderr,"exception not taken !\n"); + exit(1); + } + fprintf(stderr,"vmtest Ok\n"); + exit(0); +} + + |